Meghan Markle was upset that the hospital had canceled Lilibet's birth certificate on the Queen's order.
The late Queen's decree brought major changes to inheritance law and sparked a heated debate after the hospital confirmed that Lilibet's birth certificate had not been certified.
The Queen reportedly undertook a top-secret investigation during her lifetime, but when she learned the truth, she was distraught.
As per her Queen's suggestion, Meghan was apparently barred from entering Ball Morale after all her communications were cut off and there was no Zoom call with Lilibet.
The Queen noted an important difference between Archie's and Lilibet's birth certificates. In the UK, birth certificates are publicly available and anyone can apply for testing.
False birth registration is considered a serious crime. The claim that Lilibet's birth was the result of surrogacy is therefore unreliable as it demonstrates a lack of understanding of actual British law.
If that claim is true, neither Archie nor Lilibet are in line of succession to the throne. There are legal provisions prohibiting the inclusion of children born through adoption or surrogacy in the heirs, as stipulated in the "Succession to the Throne Bill" introduced at Hansard in the British Parliament on 13 March 2013. . Examination of Lilibet's birth certificate raised questions about its authenticity. The hospital listed on the certificate had no birth record, nor was the child listed in the royal line of succession.
Unlike Archie's birth certificate which correctly listed her father as His Royal Highness Henry Charles Albert David, Duke of Sussex, Lilibet's birth certificate is structured differently. Enter: 'First Name: Duke of Sussex, Last Name:
"Your Highness". However, Harry's first name is not "The Duke of Sussex" and his surname is not "Your Highness". Some might think that Prince Harry wrote "First Name: His Royal Highness Prince Henry Charles Albert David," or simply "H.H.H.H.H.," with a surname of "The Duke of Sussex." This raises the question of whether TMZ, who issued the certificate, forged the certificate or mixed up Harry's name details.
Also, why couldn't I access the actual certificate? Did Harry struggle with form because it was different from the layout of the English version, which could have read "H.H.H.H.H.H.H.H.H.H.H. Henry Charles Albert David, Duke of Sussex?" If so, why couldn't anyone help him? It's hard to imagine Americans prioritizing titles over real names.
As such, it is believed that no immediate family members of the royal family attended the ceremony, which was reportedly held near the couple's home in Montecito, California.
As the future royal daughter, Princess Charlotte will have the privilege of wearing the royal tiara on her wedding day if she decides to marry her. What's more, a future princess and successor to Princess Anne, Princess Charlotte, may get the chance to wear a tiara for the first time on her 21st birthday, according to a source close to the palace.
Princess Charlotte is the only daughter of her heir to the throne, and she will reportedly inherit four tiaras from the late queen, as she holds a special status in the Queen's favor. The most notable tiara Princess Charlotte could receive is the Cartier Halo tiara worn by her mother, Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, on her wedding day.
This tiara was given to King George VI as a wedding gift. It was presented to the Empress Dowager in 1923. Another of her signature tiaras is Queen Mary's fringed tiara. Both Princess Anne and Princess Beatrice wore it at their own weddings, following in the footsteps of Elizabeth II. She wore it in 1947 when she married the former Duke of Edinburgh. In addition, according to the will, Princess Charlotte may also have the opportunity to inherit the sentimental value Spencer tiara that belonged to her late grandmother, Princess Diana. Spencer's tiara was often worn by Princess Diana and is also worn by Kate, Duchess of Cambridge.
That's why Princess Charlotte was able to choose to wear these stunning tiaras on her wedding day in her tribute to her mother and her grandparents. It's worth noting that there are no rules against wearing a tiara before marriage, as evidenced by her great-aunt Princess Anne and her great-aunt Princess Margaret wearing tiaras before their wedding. . The exact age at which Princess Charlotte will wear the royal tiara for the first time has yet to be determined, but she could be in her late teens. In contrast, Meghan's daughter Lilibet reportedly won't inherit any jewelry from the late Queen.
Post a Comment