Prince Harry Drops Lilj's Privacy Lawsuit as DNA Results Reveal She's Fake


 Prince Harry's ongoing battle with the British tabloid media has now  spilled   over  to  America.   A   source   close   to   Prince   Harry   said   earlier   this   month   that   photos  of his two-year-old  daughter   Elizabeth  were  released  without  facial   blur  for  privacy   reasons.  


As a result,  Prince  Harry decided to drop  Lily's privacy  lawsuit  after  an  American  newspaper  published  a   photo  of  Lily   at  the  Fourth  of July  parade,   showing  her  unmistakable   face.   rice   field.  

The  case  was dropped  as  the court  sought   evidence  of  a  biological relationship between Lily and Harry. 


 The   Montecito  parade  was a rare  public   appearance  for Lily. The family  secretly  watched the event  from the sidewalk of  the  public road. 

 Hours   after  the parade,  a   photo  of Princess Lily in  Prince  Harry's arms  was   released  by the New York Post and Page  Six   newspapers,  both  owned   by  Rupert Murdoch's News  Corp.  The Mail Online also published  images, but  with  a  distinct  difference in  its   coverage   of  the  transatlantic.   British  publications blurred the young princess's face,  but  the New York Post and Page Six left  her   image  unedited. This disparity highlights  important  and  interesting   differences   between   British   and   American  media culture and media  law.  For Harry, this situation  left  a deep  scar   on   his   childhood,   and  he  hated  paparazzi  pictures,  especially  with  his children. This  disgust  stems from Princess Diana's  experience   of  being relentlessly pursued by  paparazzi,  and  Prince   Harry   himself,   who   encountered  media intrusion during his  childhood.  The paparazzi photographer who took  pictures of Lily and her family was reportedly hired by  Duchess  Meghan. The images were then sold to tabloids through the paparazzi photo agency Backgrid. 

 Additionally,  there is evidence  that Meghan  sent  money from her  own  bank account to the paparazzi on  July   4th.  In recent months,  Prince  Harry has  been   at   odds  with  Backgrid and Rupert Murdoch's media  for   his  involvement in the  release  of  unedited   photos  of his daughter.  Prince  Harry has been relentless in  blaming  the media  for  violating  his and his family's privacy. 

 Insiders   say  the  photo  in question  was  taken without  Prince  Harry and Lily's consent. Attempts  have   also   been  made to  persuade   the   press  to edit  her  images  to protect  her  princess. However,  Lily's  request to blur  out   her  face  was   apparently   not   met   by  the New York  Post.   Some  royal fans  have   speculated  that Meghan deliberately allowed  Lily's   face   to   appear   in  newspapers  while  Prince  Harry was unaware of her decision. 

 This discrepancy  is   due  to  differences   in  US and  UK  law  regarding publishers. In the  United   Kingdom,   data   protection   law,   based   on  European  data   protection   legislation  introduced  by  the Human Rights Act  1988,  recognizes   the  potential right to privacy  even   in   public   places  when  it   concerns   an   individual's  private life.  I'm   here.  However,  there   is   no  such  law  in the United States. 

 It's  worth noting that Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan welcomed  her  daughter  to  Santa Barbara in June  2021.  


 Some   of   Prince   Harry's   friends   have   expressed   their   disappointment   after  it was revealed that  Prince  Harry didn't attend the wedding of his supposed best man, Jack  Mann.  In his memoir,  Prince  Harry  notes  that he  appointed  Prince William  as  a   chaperone,   along   with   Prince   William,  to create an image of brotherly unity. The wedding took place  in  a  rural  church in Suffolk. 


Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

700 ads

160 ads