Meghan recently visited Camp Pendleton in San Diego's Prince neighborhood to celebrate Veterans Day. On this occasion, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, also known as the royal couple, spoke about their personal encounter.
Ads
They described morning activities where they interacted with veterans, active duty military, and their families during a short visit to Camp Pendleton as part of their tour.
A highlight of her trip was her visit to Operation VX, a special instruction program designed exclusively for children of military personnel. This project aligns with the couple's overall goals for the arts foundation and highlights the couple's commitment to supporting the military community. Meghan looked stunning during her visit, wearing a bright blue cardigan decorated with poppies to symbolize memories of the event. Prince Harry, on the other hand, opted for a navy blue blazer and light blue shirt, which he teamed with khaki pants.
But a video from the visit went viral showing Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry clearly disrespecting a young child who had fallen at Camp Pendleton. The incident is similar to Prince William's previous interaction with a newborn baby named Ali Costa in Singapore, which resulted in a touching moment when the baby playfully nibbled on the prince's finger.
Ads
Meghan is keenly aware that events like this attract public attention, and she described a similar situation between her and Prince Harry and her children in the Camp Pendleton parking lot. It seemed like it was done intentionally. In the video, a teenager wearing a yellow shirt approaches Meghan and Harry from inside the building, accompanied by someone with a camera nearby. The infant glanced back at each video, presumably to confirm that the situation was progressing as expected.
Although Meghan tried to show enthusiasm, neither Prince Harry nor Meghan were willing to help or comfort the toddler when he accidentally tripped. Some observers interpreted this as an innate lack of empathy. The mother of her young child quickly picked him up and Meghan continued to try to interact with him, even though her interest was waning. Prince Harry maintained his distance after the incident and refrained from confrontations with his children.
Ads
The discrepancy in their responses has raised questions about favoritism towards teenagers, reflecting past events such as Harry and Meghan's poor reactions and Princess Charlotte's fall from a balcony. This raised concerns that although the couple had some affinity for young people, they lacked real empathy for others.
The film's timing, just after Prince William's highly publicized birth moment, caused some people to be skeptical. These people hypothesized that Meghan may have tried to recreate a similar scenario to get media attention. Notably, the Sussexes' visit to San Diego comes shortly after allegations surfaced that they were not on the guest list for King Charles' upcoming 75th birthday party. Sources said Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan were conspicuously left out of the guest list, although Prince William, Duchess Kate, and the Queen were among their immediate family and close friends.
Ads
The prospect of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry reuniting with the royal family at Sandringham over Christmas has sparked controversy among royal enthusiasts and experts. Amid speculation, some have suggested that the couple should be required to sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) before entering the royal residence.
Express reports that royal biographer Angela Levin's proposal is based on her belief that the Sussexes have "betrayed" the royal family by sharing their complaints and accusations in public. Levin argues that the couple should not be trusted with confidential information after publicly voicing their concerns. She insists on the need for a non-disclosure agreement to prevent her from revealing any personal details or conversations that may take place at Sandringham while on holiday.
Ads
Levin expressed surprise at her queen's invitation, and she criticized the royal family's attitude as too hospitable and generous. He claims the Sussexes have "no respect" for the monarch or the institution of the monarchy.
However, not everyone supports her NDA idea. Royal critic Richard Fitzwilliams dismissed the move as "totally unrealistic" and unprecedented in the history of the royal family. Fitzwilliams said the Queen's intention was to bridge the gap between the Sussexes and the rest of the family, and a non-disclosure agreement would only exacerbate tensions and fuel resentment.
Post a Comment