Princess Diana's butler reveals that Meghan Markle's wedding tiara is a replica, increasing the Queen's suspicions that a crown heist is being planned. It looks like Princess Diana's butler spilled the beans and made some very interesting revelations about Meghan Markle's wedding tiara. She even began to suspect that the queen herself might be plotting to steal her crown.
Was Meghan Markle's charming exchange with Queen Elizabeth during her first public appearance just for show? Is it possible that Prince Harry's American bride didn't quite win his grandmother's heart with her seemingly down-to-earth personality and shared love of dogs? Ahead of the royal wedding on May 19, Meghan, also known as Brizilla, reportedly insisted on wearing a specific tiara from the Queen's collection. Reportedly, their demands became so onerous that the monarch had to step in and have a frank discussion with Prince Harry.
The Queen said she couldn't get Meghan just the tiara she wanted. She said the Queen herself would allow it. Harry's reaction wasn't exactly pleasing, it was frustrating.
Ahead of their royal wedding at Windsor Castle, Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry insisted they wanted to spend some private time with their tiaras. It appears that Meghan had a plan to steal the crown from the beginning. Considering her past actions, it's entirely understandable that her palace staff would be reluctant to leave her alone with such a valuable asset. Some may speculate that Meghan Markle has her own plans, especially given that she was aware of the Queen's past actions regarding the loss of her personal belongings.
It is noteworthy that the Queen supported Mr. Paul Burrell regarding the item borrowed from Princess Diana, intending to protect it for her sons and avoid any public scandal for her. Knowing this, Meghan may have believed that such a bold move would avoid being charged with theft. The story continues with claims that Meghan was planning to wear a particular tiara set with emeralds. A royal source suggested that Meghan may have chosen the emerald green headpiece during her visit to Buckingham Palace. However, her choice was reportedly rejected, leading to a heated exchange with her palace staff. This prompted the Queen to intervene and talk to Harry.
In addition to the tiara issue, the Queen advised Meghan to wear a veil as it is her second marriage. The Queen's message was clear. Meghan needs to be more careful when interacting with staff and follow her family's rules.
Interestingly, Meghan's interactions with her palace staff didn't just anger the Queen. There was also tension between Kate, Duchess of Cambridge and her sister-in-law. Power relations within the royal family appear to be more complicated than they initially were.
Meghan Markle has been repeatedly accused of using her royal status to advance personal interests. It was recently revealed that Archie's godfather is not a member of the royal family, raising suspicions that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are trying to commercialize their son for financial gain. Critics say that by keeping the identity of Archie's godfather a secret, Duchess Meghan and Harry have created a sense of exclusivity, heightened public curiosity and thereby profited financially from public interest in their son. claims to have obtained.
Additionally, there were reports that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry had trademarked their son's name, sparking controversy and leading to suspicions of a money-making scheme. Critics say the couple's decision to trademark "Archie Harrison" suggests they intend to use their son's name for commercial purposes, such as merchandise or branding opportunities. . This has led to concerns that the couple are using their son's royal status for financial gain, perhaps at the expense of his privacy and dignity.
According to a report by Birminghamgist, The recent revelation that Archie’s godparents are not members of the royal family has also raised concerns about the couple’s intentions. Critics argue that by choosing non-royal godparents for Archie, Meghan and Harry are signaling their desire to distance themselves from the royal family and assert their independence. However, this decision has also been interpreted as a strategic move to carve out their own commercial identities and profit from their association with Archie, as non-royal godparents may have more potential for commercial partnerships and endorsements.
Post a Comment