Australia's Foreign MP Don Farrell REVOKE Harry & Meghan's Australian Visas Calling Them Grifters


 Ads

It seems Prince Harry and Meghan Markle cannot escape controversy, as their actions during a royal tour of Australia last year have led the country's foreign affairs minister to take the unprecedented step of revoking their visitor visas and adding them to a "persona non grata" watch list. According to documents obtained by Channel 9 News, Minister for Foreign Affairs Don Frell was so concerned by allegations that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex engaged in deceptive commercial activities during their trip that violated the terms of their visas. 

Ads

Specifically, Frell reportedly believes Harry and Meghan portrayed themselves as official royal representatives on the tour when in reality, they used it as an opportunity to secretly cut lucrative sponsorship and endorsement deals for their own commercial and charitable interests. It's claimed they entertained discussions worth millions of dollars with major Australian corporations and entrepreneurs under the guise of pleasantries and engagements focused on charitable causes. However, many industry figures who met with the couple have since said they were led to believe the interactions were strictly for advancing good causes rather than any personal business goals.


If proven, such conduct would violate Australian laws regarding using a visitor visa for private commercial trade rather than obtaining proper work visas. Even more seriously, Frell views it as demonstrating behavior unbecoming of representatives of the Commonwealth, as their public and private interests appeared dangerously blurred without proper transparency or accountability. The minister believes the couple engaged in a form of "royal grifting," dangling lucrative opportunities in front of companies deceitfully under the cloak of their official roles, when any commercial activity should have been disclosed upfront according to protocol. 

Ads

This supposed deception has understandably angered the Australian government, which prides itself on fair trade and lawful conduct. Frell, no stranger to controversy himself, is standing firm that if evidence substantiates claims the Sussexes exploited Australia's hospitality by peddling influence behind closed doors, they will face lifetime bans from entering the country as punishment. They may also be subject to criminal conspiracy charges, as Australia takes its immigration laws extremely seriously and expects honesty from all foreign visitors.


Naturally, spokespeople for Harry and Meghan have slammed these "baseless accusations" aimed at tainting their reputation through speculative claims. However, many argue it's telling that the Sussex camp is refusing the government's simple request to provide transparency around any commercial arrangements made during the tour, which could help determine the validity of the allegations raised. Some experts warn Frell's hostile response risks damaging Australia-UK relations given their shared history. However, Frell counters that consequences must apply equally to all, and allowing influential foreign nationals to exploit loopholes erodes the integrity of both the monarchy and democracy.

Ads<

/p>

Whatever the facts of this matter, it's undeniable that Harry and Meghan continue to find themselves embroiled in controversy, often related to a lack of disclosure or care taken regarding potential appearances of impropriety. Their lucrative Netflix deal, which uses royal trademarks without permission from the British monarchy, remains a simmering issue. Time will tell if an official investigation into Minister Frell's concerns will substantiate claims requiring the tough penalties threatened. But it's clear this drama is far from over. Will the Sussexes choose to fully cooperate to clear their name, or stubbornly double down on their defiance? One thing is for certain - another major PR challenge now looms for this headline-grabbing royal duo, whose commercial adventures always seem to court controversy.

Ads

There are valid arguments on both sides. Frell's decisive response was undoubtedly political, but the claims also warrant a proper investigation given the serious implications. The couple's decision not to be transparent raises many eyebrows and validates at least some of the minister's concerns. Their global celebrity grants Harry and Meghan many opportunities, but also brings greater scrutiny - they would be wise to be more careful about potential conflicts of interest going forward. Only time will tell how this saga ultimately unfolds.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

700 ads

160 ads