Meghan EXPLODES in ANGER as Palace Tosses Out Proof of Fake Arch!e's Birth Certificate, Haz SHOCKED


 Meghan Markle  gets   swept   up  in  birth   certificate   drama   with   palace   changes   'cause  we're about to  talk   about  the birth certificate drama involving none other than Prince  Harry and Meghan  Markle's   adorable   son   Prince   Archie   It's   from  


About a month after  Archie   was   born,  Buckingham Palace  was   embroiled  in  suspicion  of  falsifying  his birth certificate.  What's   the  juicy part? Meghan Markle's name was  reportedly  replaced with her  job   title   and   listed  as "Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex."  She's   talking  about erasing her identity, right?  The  eyebrow-raising development was reported by The Sun, and it didn't take long for  allegations  to  begin   to   surface.  

According to Meghan  Markle  and  Prince  Harry's  public   relations  team in sunny California, the  change   was  not  made   by   them.   It   is   believed   that  they were  probably   ordered  by the palace. Yes, you  heard.   Apparently,  Buckingham Palace was  pulling the strings, not the Duke and Duchess.  Buckingham  Palace,   however,  quickly  fought   back   and   denied  any involvement in the  incident.   Her  sources  claimed  that it was  Kensington  Palace   officials,  not Buckingham, who made the  change.   Quite   the   opposite   point   of   view!  


Let's  recap  what happened.  According   to   reports,   the   name   "Rachel   Meghan"   has   been   removed   from  Meghan's  birth certificate,  with   the   focus   instead   being   on  her royal  title.  The big question  remains.   Who   is  really behind this  change?  The Sun  reached  out to Prince Harry and Meghan  Markle   to   get   some   answers,  but  was met with  silence   when   asked   for   comment.   This   excitement  is real! 


 Now  here's the kicker,  folks,  insiders claim  the purpose behind  this  change was to  keep  the  Duchess'  name and title  consistent   in   all  private  correspondence.   But   is   consistency  worth erasing Meghan's identity?  It   is  a  difficult   tablet  to swallow. 

 Meghan Markle  is   arguably  a polarizing figure  within  the royal family, and this birth certificate drama adds  a   new  layer  to the  controversy.  Whether Buckingham Palace really pulled the strings or  shifted  the blame  to  Kensington Palace,  the   truth  may never  be   known.  One thing is for  sure,  this scandal is  not   over   yet.  Recently, an unseen video of Meghan Markle  in  a 2013 Wella magazine  ad   resurfaced   and   made   headlines.  Meghan was  an   aspiring   star   player   at   the   time,  but the ad  wasn't  well  received   by  some.  Her   critics   noted  her very  white  skin and Cruella-like  charisma   and   said  there was no trace of her Nigerian roots. 

 However, it's important to note that this ad  is  from a time when Meghan had little control over such decisions,  years before  she   joined  the British royal family. 

 A source close to  the  former  Wella  employee  in the  US   has  revealed that Meghan had a  disputed  relationship with  some   of  the company's top stylists. She was reportedly  germophobic  and frequently asked for free hair care products.  She   also  allegedly  made   fun   of  a stylist named  Aubrey   Roots  by calling  her  gay. 

 Criticism   continues   in  the resurfaced  video.   Hairstylist  Alexander  Blagojevich  appears to  be   teasing   Meghan   Markle's   haircut,  which  has   been   described   as   "terrible."  Some  have  even  gone   so  far as  to   describe  her  appearance   as  a  "low-rent   escort",  citing  dirty  lipstick and messy makeup,  hair  and clothes. 

 Opinions   are   clearly   divided   over   her   Duchess   Meghan  talent and  her   accomplishments.  Some argue that she  has   not  achieved as much as she  would   like,  while others highlight her numerous opportunities in the entertainment industry.  But   the  criticism  is   persistent,  and  public  perception of her seems divided. 

 With   this   in   mind,  some experts,  such   as  American  film  director and entertainment coach Paul Dudridge,  believe  that the hiatus  Prince  Harry and Meghan  Markle  are  going   through   is   causing   them   to   reconsider   their   creative   strategies   and   change   their   image.   It   suggests   that   it  could be an opportunity  to  get   back.  They are encouraged to  achieve  critical success in their creative endeavors to  turn  the  story   upside   down  and regain public favor.  

It remains to be seen how  Prince  Harry and Meghan  Markle  will  use  this  time  and what their next  steps  will be. But for now,  her  public image and creative  work   have   been   the   subject  of much  debate  and  controversy.   Recently,  an unseen video of Meghan Markle from a 2013  advert   for  Wella magazine  resurfaced   and   caused  a  lot   of   buzz.   At   the   time,  Meghan was  an   aspiring   star   player,  but the ad  wasn't  well  received   by  some. Critics  noted  her very  white  skin and Cruella-like  charisma   and   said  there was no trace of her Nigerian roots. 

 However, it's important to note that this ad  is  from a time when Meghan had little control over such decisions,  years before  she   joined  the British royal family. 

 A source close to  the  former  Wella  employee  in the  US   has  revealed that Meghan had a  disputed  relationship with  some   of  the company's top stylists. She was reportedly  germophobic  and frequently asked for free hair care products.  She   also  allegedly  made   fun   of  a stylist named  Aubrey   Roots  by calling  her  gay.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

700 ads

160 ads