About a month after Archie was born, Buckingham Palace was embroiled in suspicion of falsifying his birth certificate. What's the juicy part? Meghan Markle's name was reportedly replaced with her job title and listed as "Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex." She's talking about erasing her identity, right? The eyebrow-raising development was reported by The Sun, and it didn't take long for allegations to begin to surface.
According to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's public relations team in sunny California, the change was not made by them. It is believed that they were probably ordered by the palace. Yes, you heard. Apparently, Buckingham Palace was pulling the strings, not the Duke and Duchess. Buckingham Palace, however, quickly fought back and denied any involvement in the incident. Her sources claimed that it was Kensington Palace officials, not Buckingham, who made the change. Quite the opposite point of view!
Let's recap what happened. According to reports, the name "Rachel Meghan" has been removed from Meghan's birth certificate, with the focus instead being on her royal title. The big question remains. Who is really behind this change? The Sun reached out to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to get some answers, but was met with silence when asked for comment. This excitement is real!
Now here's the kicker, folks, insiders claim the purpose behind this change was to keep the Duchess' name and title consistent in all private correspondence. But is consistency worth erasing Meghan's identity? It is a difficult tablet to swallow.
Meghan Markle is arguably a polarizing figure within the royal family, and this birth certificate drama adds a new layer to the controversy. Whether Buckingham Palace really pulled the strings or shifted the blame to Kensington Palace, the truth may never be known. One thing is for sure, this scandal is not over yet. Recently, an unseen video of Meghan Markle in a 2013 Wella magazine ad resurfaced and made headlines. Meghan was an aspiring star player at the time, but the ad wasn't well received by some. Her critics noted her very white skin and Cruella-like charisma and said there was no trace of her Nigerian roots.
However, it's important to note that this ad is from a time when Meghan had little control over such decisions, years before she joined the British royal family.
A source close to the former Wella employee in the US has revealed that Meghan had a disputed relationship with some of the company's top stylists. She was reportedly germophobic and frequently asked for free hair care products. She also allegedly made fun of a stylist named Aubrey Roots by calling her gay.
Criticism continues in the resurfaced video. Hairstylist Alexander Blagojevich appears to be teasing Meghan Markle's haircut, which has been described as "terrible." Some have even gone so far as to describe her appearance as a "low-rent escort", citing dirty lipstick and messy makeup, hair and clothes.
Opinions are clearly divided over her Duchess Meghan talent and her accomplishments. Some argue that she has not achieved as much as she would like, while others highlight her numerous opportunities in the entertainment industry. But the criticism is persistent, and public perception of her seems divided.
With this in mind, some experts, such as American film director and entertainment coach Paul Dudridge, believe that the hiatus Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are going through is causing them to reconsider their creative strategies and change their image. It suggests that it could be an opportunity to get back. They are encouraged to achieve critical success in their creative endeavors to turn the story upside down and regain public favor.
It remains to be seen how Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will use this time and what their next steps will be. But for now, her public image and creative work have been the subject of much debate and controversy. Recently, an unseen video of Meghan Markle from a 2013 advert for Wella magazine resurfaced and caused a lot of buzz. At the time, Meghan was an aspiring star player, but the ad wasn't well received by some. Critics noted her very white skin and Cruella-like charisma and said there was no trace of her Nigerian roots.
However, it's important to note that this ad is from a time when Meghan had little control over such decisions, years before she joined the British royal family.
A source close to the former Wella employee in the US has revealed that Meghan had a disputed relationship with some of the company's top stylists. She was reportedly germophobic and frequently asked for free hair care products. She also allegedly made fun of a stylist named Aubrey Roots by calling her gay.
إرسال تعليق