Meghan, who is returning to social media under the moniker @Megan, has already amassed several followers, including her friend and activist Mandana Dayani (former president of Sussex media and philanthropy Archwell). reportedly.
A seemingly innocuous Instagram account is drawing attention. Her profile picture features an archival image of Markle's favorite flower, the peony. The account currently boasts a modest follower count of between 8,200 and 2,600, raising questions about the credibility of that figure. Rumor has it that some followers may have been acquired through purchased subscriptions, a common practice on social media platforms.
Markle's brand and potential social media revenue are also under scrutiny. Her public relations team claims she can make $1 million per post, but it's unclear how much her brand is really worth and what it represents. The idea of making that much money per post places them in the top influencer league, even surpassing the Kardashians. But it seems highly unlikely that a woman in her 40s whose last name isn't Kardashian would charge such a high price for a social media endorsement.
Megan Markle is not a Target influencer when it comes to big brands like Cartier, Givenchy, and Dior. These luxury brands typically employ the services of established influencers who have significant influence and track records of partnering with big name labels. Markle has worked with Chanel, Pantene, and Tod's, but Cartier has never worked with her.
Markle's skepticism about potential earnings stems from the fact that if big brands thought she could boost her sales, they would already be looking for her. Cartier's refusal to partner with Markle further strengthened this sentiment. Hollywood seems to want either talent or financial clout, and without both, star power may be forgotten.
His claims that he earns $1 million per post and earns billion-dollar profits are considered by many to be an exaggeration. As Markle's Instagram following grows, it's unlikely she'll hit the reported financial milestones. Additionally, her unpopularity is shown by the fact that she has disabled comments on her own posts. Hundreds of millions of dollars in reported Netflix and Spotify deals remain unconfirmed, and repeating these figures as facts could overstate Markle.
Markle's Instagram presence could be financially beneficial, but she doesn't earn enough to sustain a lavish lifestyle that includes property taxes, a private jet and a large workforce. I doubt if she will. PR experts fear Markle's decision to return to social media could cast a bad light on the Sussexes, who have been accused of selfishly pursuing financial success. have expressed.
The perception that the British royal family will commercialize its position and adopt the behavior of US reality TV stars is seen as a move that will further deepen existing public irritation.
To restore their reputation, the Sussexes may need to keep a low profile and refrain from controversial interactions. Markle's return to Instagram is seen by some as another failure in a string of controversial moves. We encourage them to rethink their approach and find other ways to better navigate the public without adding fuel to the fire.
Post a Comment