Cartier CEO DROP MASSIVE BLOW on Meghan Denies $1M Partnership with Duchess Amid Embarrassin IG post


 In a recent Instagram post,  Cartier's  CEO  denied   an   allegation  of  a  $1 million partnership with Meghan Markle. The news has  been   controversial,   with  many  questioning  the truth behind the alleged collaboration. 

Meghan,  who is  returning  to social media under the  moniker  @Megan, has already  amassed  several followers, including her friend and activist Mandana  Dayani   (former  president of  Sussex  media and  philanthropy   Archwell).   reportedly.  

 A   seemingly   innocuous  Instagram  account   is   drawing  attention.  Her  profile  picture  features  an   archival  image of  Markle's favorite  flower,  the  peony.   The  account  currently  boasts a modest  follower   count  of  between  8,200  and   2,600,  raising questions about the  credibility  of  that   figure.   Rumor   has   it  that some followers may have been acquired through purchased subscriptions, a common practice on social media platforms. 

 Markle's brand and potential  social media  revenue   are  also  under scrutiny.  Her   public   relations  team claims she  can   make   $1  million  per post,  but   it's  unclear how much her brand is  really  worth and what it represents. The  idea  of  ​​making   that   much   money  per post  places   them  in the  top  influencer   league,   even  surpassing  the Kardashians.  But  it seems highly unlikely that a woman in her  40s  whose last name isn't  Kardashian  would  charge  such a  high   price  for  a  social media  endorsement.  

 Megan   Markle   is   not   a   Target   influencer   when  it comes to  big  brands like Cartier, Givenchy, and  Dior.  These luxury brands typically  employ  the services of established influencers  who   have  significant influence and  track  records  of  partnering  with  big   name  labels.  Markle has  worked  with Chanel, Pantene, and  Tod's,   but  Cartier has  never   worked  with her. 

 Markle's  skepticism  about  potential earnings stems from the fact that if  big  brands  thought  she could  boost   her   sales,  they would  already  be   looking   for   her.  Cartier's  refusal   to   partner  with Markle  further   strengthened  this sentiment.  Hollywood  seems   to   want  either talent or financial  clout,  and without  both,  star power may  be   forgotten.  

 His  claims  that   he   earns   $1  million  per post and  earns  billion-dollar  profits  are  considered  by many  to   be   an   exaggeration.   As  Markle's  Instagram  following  grows,   it's  unlikely  she'll   hit  the reported financial milestones.  Additionally,  her  unpopularity  is  shown   by   the   fact   that   she   has   disabled  comments on her  own  posts.  Hundreds  of millions  of   dollars   in   reported  Netflix and Spotify deals remain unconfirmed, and repeating these figures as facts  could   overstate   Markle.  

 Markle's Instagram presence  could  be financially  beneficial,   but   she   doesn't   earn  enough  to sustain a lavish  lifestyle   that   includes  property taxes,  a  private  jet  and a large  workforce.   I   doubt   if   she   will.  PR experts  fear  Markle's decision to  return   to  social media  could   cast   a   bad   light  on the Sussexes, who have  been   accused  of  selfishly  pursuing financial  success.   have   expressed.  

The perception  that   the  British royal  family   will   commercialize   its  position and  adopt  the behavior of  US  reality TV  stars  is seen as a move that  will  further  deepen  existing  public   irritation.  

 To   restore  their reputation, the Sussexes may need to  keep  a  low  profile and refrain from  controversial  interactions.  Markle's  return   to  Instagram  is  seen  by some as  another  failure  in a  string  of controversial moves.  We   encourage   them   to   rethink  their approach and find  other  ways to  better  navigate the public  without adding fuel to the fire. 

Post a Comment

أحدث أقدم

700 ads

160 ads