Buckingham Palace recently announced that King Charles and Queen Camilla will give a warm welcome to South Korean President Yun-seok Yuld on his official visit to the UK in November. Such visits typically include grand ceremonies, horse-drawn carriage parades, and formal state dinners at Buckingham Palace. Insiders believe the Duchess of Cambridge's choice to wear Britain's iconic tiara at the prestigious event could add to her collection of royal jewels. The development reportedly upset Meghan Markle, who had expressed a strong interest in the royal crown. for she does not seem to have the opportunity to adorn herself with such treasures.
It is common for female members of the royal family to wear tiaras at state banquets, and Duchess Kate and Queen Camilla also attended a state banquet during a visit to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in November 2022. . Duchess Kate wore a lotus tiara, while Camilla wore a Belgian sapphire tiara that once belonged to Queen Elizabeth II.
Although it is unlikely that President Yuld will put on a musical performance like the one in the United States, the state banquet is expected to be a grand affair, perhaps with a string orchestra as entertainment. The state visit is significant because King Charles himself visited South Korea in 1992 and was one of the guests of honor at a state dinner hosted for South Korean leaders in 2004. Meanwhile, Duchess Kate is taking a strategic approach to the ongoing drama surrounding Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan. Duchess Kate and Prince William have decided not to publicly discuss their feud with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, instead choosing to take a different approach, royal experts say. Royal commentator Duncan Larcombe believes that Duchess Kate believes in the adage that "slow and steady wins the race" and that instead of getting involved in public controversy, she will He revealed that he was ignoring the trivial issues raised by the government.
Mr Larcombe explained that the Invictus Games were an important event for Harry and Meghan, and that Kate had to accept at the time that it was a "Harry and Meghan show". The way Duchess Kate deals with her own actions is to keep her dignity and carry out her royal duties. Larcombe added that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's strategy, known as "keep calm and carry on", has so far proven successful. They focus their energy on their responsibilities and avoid getting involved in public debate. The royal couple has refrained from dwelling on Harry and Meghan's revelations, choosing instead to remain calm and dedicated to the work of the royal family.
In recent years, Duchess Meghan has attracted media and public attention for her unconventional approach to royal life. While some hail her as a modern, progressive force in the British monarchy, others argue that her actions were self-destructive and tarnished her reputation. As speculation mounts about Prince Harry's possible return to the royal family, experts wonder if Meghan Markle missed an opportunity to make a positive impact and whether a return to the royal family is even possible. . Meghan Markle's joining The Firm has caused great excitement and anticipation. The biracial American actress represented a new era in the British royal family by breaking barriers and challenging convention. Her marriage to Prince Harry was seen by many as a step towards a more inclusive and diverse system. But critics argue that because Meghan did not follow royal traditions and protocol, she missed an opportunity to be a positive force within the royal family. According to the BBC's A report on Sunday, September 1, 2023, Meghan's independent and outspoken personality clashed with the constraints of royal life from the start. Their desire to modernize certain aspects of the monarchy and their willingness to challenge the status quo was met with resistance and criticism from traditionalists. While many praised her willingness to change, others felt her approach alienated her key stakeholders and tarnished her image. Some experts believe Meghan had an opportunity to use her role as a celebrity royal to make a lasting impression. By accepting her heritage and the responsibilities that come with her position, she could have worked more effectively within the system and advocated for cause and effect for change. But her decision to step back from royal duties and pursue a more independent lifestyle calls into question her commitment to being a force for positive change within the institution.
إرسال تعليق