Meghan Markle served as the host of the podcast, which ran for 12 episodes last year with the stated mission of challenging, dissecting, and subverting the labels that hold women back. The chief executive of Spotify has now shed light on why he believes the podcast didn't succeed, potentially leading to the famous couple's removal from their £18 million podcast deal.
In an interview with the BBC, the Spotify boss explained, "We thought new innovation was needed to happen here. We thought we could provide a great experience that would make consumers very happy and open up new avenues for new developers. The truth is, some worked and some didn't. We hope that we learn from this and wish all of us who were not able to achieve maximum success for the future. ”
During the interview, he was asked if the Sussexes' 12 podcasts over two years were worth £18 million. In response to this question, Spotify's CEO expressed his frustration.
The Sussexes officially parted ways with Spotify in June after just one series. After the deal fell apart, they attempted to obtain exclusive copyright to the name "Archewell Audio". However, their application was rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office due to the risk of confusion with an existing trademark.
Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan's Spotify deal is controversial. Critics said the companies had failed to produce content worth the multi-million pound investment. The situation prompted Spotify to issue a statement to investors, and the conflict in the music world forced even Spotify executives to take the issue to the UK Parliament.
Meanwhile, investments in Spotify's home studio, Montecito, have proven to be more successful, such as live reconstructions of episodes of his podcast. There have also been reports that equipment has been moved from the royal couple's holiday home, suggesting that no agreement has been reached to seal the deal. If the two sides cannot reach an agreement, Meghan and Harry will likely have to take legal action.
The Spotify executive also took the opportunity to criticize the Sussexes on an episode of his podcast, The Griff, saying they should have started the podcast.
Will Meghan and Harry ever learn to keep their opinions to themselves? Critics have accused the Sussexes of commenting on world events. Yesterday, Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry, the Duke and Duchess of Hypocrisy, broke their silence on the ongoing crisis in Israel by issuing a statement on the Archewell Foundation website. Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry's statement was titled "It is with heavy hearts" that it said: "At the Archewell Foundation, we stand with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, and stand against all acts of terrorism and brutality. We will continue to support our partners and organizations on the front lines in Israel, provide urgently needed aid, and support all the innocent victims of this unacceptable level of human suffering."
However, her statement did not explicitly condemn the violence. Instead, they were provided with vague messages that seemed to be a pattern for them. Are they good at making real change? Many are skeptical. Critics have spoken out against it, and this article highlights some of their views.
Renowned author Jean More said the Sussexes seemed to have a knack for inserting themselves into situations around the world, often making things worse. They tend to share their opinions on any topic, believing that it is all their own work, even though they are not necessarily experts in the field. Mr. Jan also pointed out that his own statement did not specifically criticize Hamas, which has been criticized by many.
Other celebrities, including Kim Kardashian and Madonna, have also commented on the situation in Israel. While these celebrities may feel the need to speak out, what makes Meghan and Harry's involvement stand out is that they are not traditional celebrities. They are trying to master the transition from members of the British royal family to influential figures themselves.
Another royal commentator, Lady C, also expressed her views, claiming that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, unlike Prince William and King Charles, do not have the ability to speak out on international relations. She believes that her involvement seems to be more about promoting her own image than actually addressing the issue at hand.
Another royal commentator, Phil Dampier, agreed, saying that if Meghan and Harry have personal issues to deal with, they might be better off avoiding international politics. He explained.
إرسال تعليق